The development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has extended into various sectors, including the world of art. AI’s ability to produce visual works that mimic the distinctive styles of renowned artists, such as those from Studio Ghibli, has raised questions about originality, copyright, and the future of the artist profession.
Amid concerns about the potential threat AI poses to the role of human artists, on the other hand, many regard this technology as a powerful creative tool. This raises an important question: what is the true position of artists in the era of artificial intelligence? Are the fears surrounding the loss of originality in art well-founded, or does AI instead open new avenues for artistic expression? Explore this issue further in an exclusive interview conducted by Identitas reporter Rika Sartika with a Bandung-born artist and the curator of Ruang Seni Rupa Gallery in Makassar since 2013, Siswadi Abustam, on Wednesday (09/04).
As an artist who has long been involved in the art field, what are your thoughts on AI technology’s ability to copy the visual style of artists?
With the advancement of technology, we should embrace it. AI can actually accelerate the creative process and enhance the quality of the work. Technology is merely a tool; what truly matters is the artist behind it. No matter how sophisticated the technology is, it will not produce quality artwork if the input is not optimal.
In your opinion, what distinguishes artworks created by an artist’s hand from those produced by AI, even if they appear very similar?
Similar does not mean the same. True artwork possesses character and an aura within it. AI-generated works lack the aura or the unique strokes that are a direct expression of the artist. AI is merely a computer following commands and has no soul in it.
As an artist dedicated to educating the public about art, do you see any educational opportunities arising from AI technology, or do you view it more as a challenge?
The era of classical art has passed, and I strive to keep up with the times by creating contemporary works that utilize technology. From an educational perspective, AI is very beneficial because what matters most for artists is consistency in creating. Artists who can adapt to technology will thrive.
Looking ahead, how do you foresee the relationship between traditional artists and AI technology evolving over the next 5 to 10 years?
Artists should learn to keep up with technological advancements to ensure their work remains relevant in today’s world. Although technology is nothing more than a tool, artists who can harness it will produce more contemporary works. Above all, consistency in creating art is essential, as every stroke offers a new lesson.
How does AI-generated imagery impact the economic value of artworks, particularly for young artists who are just starting their careers?
There may be some impact, but it is not highly significant, as AI-generated works remain different from those created by hand. The art market still greatly values the manual process, which involves skill and the personal touch of the artist. For example, portrait paintings by Chinese artists can be valued at hundreds of billions of rupiah—not because of technology, but due to the intricacy of detail and the authenticity of handcrafted work.
Do you agree that AI-generated images should require permission or pay royalties to the artists whose styles are being replicated?
Granting licenses to artists is a form of recognition for the originality of their work. I strongly support a royalty system as a means of acknowledging copyright and the hard work of artists. However, in the end, the decision rests with each individual.
In your opinion, should there be ethical boundaries or specific regulations regarding the use of AI technology in creating artworks?
I do not see it as a high urgency because AI-generated works cannot match those created by the hand and soul of an artist. As an artist, every piece I create is a part of my soul.
If you were to come across an AI-generated work that specifically imitates your style, how would you feel and how would you respond?
If someone uses AI to imitate my work, I would actually be grateful because it shows that my art is appreciated and considered worthy of imitation. I am thankful for such recognition.
As someone who encourages art appreciation, what do you think are the best ways to educate the public to value the creative process of human artists in an era where AI-generated visuals are so easily available?
South Sulawesi actually has a long history in visual arts, as evidenced by the paintings in Leang-Leang, Maros, which date back thousands of years. However, the development of the visual arts in our region still lags behind. Public appreciation for the arts needs to be further enhanced. Rather than being pessimistic, we must continue creating and adapting.
Do you think more artists will use AI in the future?
Certainly, this is an inevitable development. However, it is important to remember that AI and technology are simply “tools,” like a gun, while the quality of the final outcome is determined by the “shooter,” in this case, the artist. Artists need to embrace this technology to avoid being left behind. By learning and mastering new technologies, their artworks can become more compelling and have the potential to gain recognition on the international stage.
Read the original article in Bahasa
Source Information:
Siswadi Abustam
Born in Bandung, June 21, 1958
Curator of Ruang Seni Rupa Gallery, Makassar, since 2013
Educational Background:
University of Florida, 1979–1983
Original Writer:
Azzahra Dzahabiyyah Asyila Rahma
Translated by: Aynun Lutfiya
